8:32 am
August 23, 2010
stewartthesmith said
Let's say, hypothetically, that I am a construction company, and build a mall. I bring in subcontractors, who build the foundation, lay the bricks, plumb all the buildings, wire them for juice, put a roof on the structure, etc. etc. Let's say I have a dispute with the subcontractor who poured the foundation. Does he have the right to remove the foundation, allowing the entire structure to collapse? Especially since that subcontractor SIGNED a contract with me! IFI has a terms of service agreement for all of its members who sign up to that forum, which basically amounts to a CONTRACT! If you read that contract, IFI has LICENSE to do whatever it wants with your COPYRIGHTED material, and every member of that site agreed with those terms.
I would use a different analogy:
A local blacksmith group is having a hammer in, people show up and you have brought some of your tools (anvil, leg vise, handcrank forge) over to make sure everyone has the ability to get anvil time. For some reason or another the shop owner is grumpy and starts an argument with you which results in you being kicked off his property. Thing is he will not give your tools back.
What would you do then, after being ignored for a moth or so of trying to get hold of shop owner??
Rob
8:37 am
December 27, 2011
Your analogy is specious for one reason. If someone kicks you off their property, they usually give you a reasonable amount of time and opportunity to remove your tools.
The second reason why your logic is fallacious is that when you visited someone else's shop, the lines are distinct between what is his and what property is yours. When it come to intellectual property, IFI has license to use your intellectual property, so the line is blurred, and thank GOD it is!
11:39 am
August 23, 2010
11:46 am
August 23, 2010
ciladog said
In the first place IFI did not have a TOS that spoke to copyright licenses before I filed the takedown notice. If they had, this would not be happening. The TOS that you will see when the site comes back online was just added.I know you have been a member for quite a long time. And in that time you have been able to manage your attachments through your profile and manage attachments. You can delete any attachment you choose. That means that IFI claims no license on those attachments. Do you think it is ok for them to confiscate my images because they ban me?
I stand by my analogy. according to ciladogs post here only the new TOS speaks to copyright...
Think about it- if he signed away his rights when joining that site nobody would listen to his complaint about them not giving his property back. No different than the shop owner not returning tools in my analogy. If you had to sign an agreement on entering the shop that said if you get kicked out he keeps the tools, I would venture to believe that you would not bring much in the way of tools.
Rob
2:30 pm
September 6, 2010
stewartthesmith said
Let me introduce you to something taught in university english classes, a phenomenon called analogy. IFI IS a general contractor, disseminating blacksmithing information, "brick by brick", as if in a "foundation". One cannot arbitrarily remove "bricks" from an informational foundation without the structure collapsing. I have close to two thouand, five hundred posts on that site. If I have a hissy-fit and want all my informational contributions back, is that fair or even marginally reasonable? YOU TELL ME!
What would happen, not only to IFI, but similar sites including THIS ONE, if every time someone had a "toothache" or an "upset stomach", they decided to take their football and go home(sorry for the mixed metaphor, folks, lol)! Nobody would win!
I will tell you Stewartthesmith.
None of this had to happen if IFI had any respect for the member that contribute to the site beyond what color should I paint my anvil. They don't. It is run like a fiefdom with the in crowd can do no wrong. Yourself included. Everyone else is dirt.
I really wonder how you would react if one day you were banned from the site without any explanation and not allowed to respond to your threads (all 2,500 of them) or your attachments and all attempts to communicate were ignored. Maybe you would see it differently.
This didn't have to happen this way. IFI drove the bus and this is the road they chose.
2:43 pm
December 27, 2011
well, craig, you are still on my friends list on IFI. I have no beef with you at all. What has me angry, however, are the consequences of this dispute. I have found the site owner, Glenn, to be intrinsically fair, once all sides have been presented to him. I also respect you as a blacksmith after viewing your Youtube channel. Having said that, perhaps you should have talked to Glenn directly, man to man. Then a site with 28 thousand members wouldn't have been scuttled......
2:47 pm
September 6, 2010
stewartthesmith said
well, craig, you are still on my friends list on IFI. I have no beef with you at all. What has me angry, however, are the consequences of this dispute. I have found the site owner, Glenn, to be intrinsically fair, once all sides have been presented to him. I also respect you as a blacksmith after viewing your Youtube channel. Having said that, perhaps you should have talked to Glenn directly, man to man. Then a site with 28 thousand members wouldn't have been scuttled......
I tried, believe me I tired. Email, phone calls, then it went to certified letters to the owner and then to the lawyer. You name it I tried. Everything was ignored.
3:02 pm
August 4, 2010
To me you didn't try one thing you should have. Not acting like a child. You took your ball and went home. It was immature. I don't care if you get upset. I don't care if that makes you angry. Children act like that not adults. You didn't have to do what you did. You chose to. And in choosing to you deprived 80,000 people from 150 nations an international forum. That was selfish. I don't care what your contributions to the blacksmithing community are. I don't care how hurt you thought you were. It was wrong of you to do that to so many people.
3:03 pm
September 6, 2010
stewartthesmith said
When it come to intellectual property, IFI has license to use your intellectual property, so the line is blurred, and thank GOD it is!
Don't drink the Koolaid stewartthesmith. Here is the TOS before I filed the notice. Things are going to be different when the site comes back online. Look at the bottom right of every page for the TOS link when the site is back online.
3:13 pm
September 6, 2010
K. Bryan Morgan said
To me you didn't try one thing you should have. Not acting like a child. You took your ball and went home. It was immature. I don't care if you get upset. I don't care if that makes you angry. Children act like that not adults. You didn't have to do what you did. You chose to. And in choosing to you deprived 80,000 people from 150 nations an international forum. That was selfish. I don't care what your contributions to the blacksmithing community are. I don't care how hurt you thought you were. It was wrong of you to do that to so many people.
In the first place Bryan, I didn't do this to 80,000 people. IFI had the wherewithal to comply with the notice in the 48 hours they had. They chose not to as it seems to play drama queen and raise funds for who knows what. Those founds may go to buy the owner a new truck. How would you know?
Second, You too should not drink the Kool-Aid and believe everything IFI says.
3:13 pm
December 27, 2011
everything I post on their site becomes intrinsic to THEIR website.........even though I own my copyright, once it is part of their site, it becomes THEIRs as well...........what is so hard to grasp about that?
I have had run-ins with the party you are talking about. Wanna know something? He was man enough to apologise to me when he acted hastily. That is because I logically discussed it with him in private, rather than flaming, then taking my ball and going home. And this wasn't the first time there was friction between us. The management team, inevitiably, adjudicates everything in a fair and square manner. You should have waited until everything calmed down, and then talked to them without fire on your tongue.....
3:22 pm
August 4, 2010
Its now how it is legal wise. Its how it is moral wise. You just don't get it. You feel harmed so your taking it out on everyone else on the site. Not just Glenn. Its all of us. You care more about you and yours than us and ours. In my old life we would have called you and individual. And that would have been no complement. In fact it is the worst thing a person can be. A non team player. So your all butt hurt.. boo hoo .. waa profanity waa. I'mma take my ball and go home. You did this. You didn't have to. You took it to this level. You didn't have to. Whats so hard to understand about that.
PS. I never drink the koolaid. I never take anything at face value. And right now I don't care one bit about your rights to YOUR property intellectual or otherwise. Keep your ball and play by yourself.
3:28 pm
September 6, 2010
stewartthesmith said
everything I post on their site becomes intrinsic to THEIR website.........even though I own my copyright, once it is part of their site, it becomes THEIRs as well...........what is so hard to grasp about that?
Well that is the case now. But it wasn't before the notice. This is a legal issue about copyright rights.
I spent days researching issues about TOS and copyright licenses. IFI had no license because they, in my opinion, were arrogant and thought they could do what ever they wanted. But they had no license. Period. If they had a license I couldn't have filed the notice.
3:33 pm
December 27, 2011
ciladog said
stewartthesmith said
everything I post on their site becomes intrinsic to THEIR website.........even though I own my copyright, once it is part of their site, it becomes THEIRs as well...........what is so hard to grasp about that?
Well that is the case now. But it wasn't before the notice. This is a legal issue about copyright rights.
I spent days researching issues about TOS and copyright licenses. IFI had no license because they, in my opinion, were arrogant and thought they could do what ever they wanted. But they had no license. Period. If they had a license I couldn't have filed the notice.
Just read KBM's post above this.................this is NOT about legality.............this is about morality...........and sometimes the two are dichotomous
3:36 pm
September 6, 2010
K. Bryan Morgan said
Its now how it is legal wise. Its how it is moral wise. You just don't get it. You feel harmed so your taking it out on everyone else on the site. Not just Glenn. Its all of us. You care more about you and yours than us and ours. In my old life we would have called you and individual. And that would have been no complement. In fact it is the worst thing a person can be. A non team player. So your all butt hurt.. boo hoo .. waa profanity waa. I'mma take my ball and go home. You did this. You didn't have to. You took it to this level. You didn't have to. Whats so hard to understand about that.
PS. I never drink the koolaid. I never take anything at face value. And right now I don't care one bit about your rights to YOUR property intellectual or otherwise. Keep your ball and play by yourself.
As I have already said, this is an unintended consequences of what happened. It didn't have to happen this way. I am not the one who took IFI offline. They did. Call me all the name you want and through those insults. When it happens to you, you will understand. Don't think it won't.
3:38 pm
August 23, 2010
ciladog said
Well that is the case now. But it wasn't before the notice. This is a legal issue about copyright rights.I spent days researching issues about TOS and copyright licenses. IFI had no license because they, in my opinion, were arrogant and thought they could do what ever they wanted. But they had no license. Period. If they had a license I couldn't have filed the notice.
Well said, I think you did the right thing. I hope this will have the end result of that moderator being asked to leave the team for the good of the site.
Rob
3:50 pm
August 4, 2010
K. Bryan Morgan said
Its now how it is legal wise. Its how it is moral wise. You just don't get it. You feel harmed so your taking it out on everyone else on the site. Not just Glenn. Its all of us. You care more about you and yours than us and ours. In my old life we would have called you and individual. And that would have been no complement. In fact it is the worst thing a person can be. A non team player. So your all butt hurt.. boo hoo .. waa profanity waa. I'mma take my ball and go home. You did this. You didn't have to. You took it to this level. You didn't have to. Whats so hard to understand about that.
PS. I never drink the koolaid. I never take anything at face value. And right now I don't care one bit about your rights to YOUR property intellectual or otherwise. Keep your ball and play by yourself.
As I have already said, this is an unintended consequences of what happened. It didn't have to happen this way. I am not the one who took IFI offline. They did. Call me all the name you want and through those insults. When it happens to you, you will understand. Don't think it won't.
3:51 pm
August 4, 2010
ciladog said
ciladog said
As I have already said, this is an unintended consequences of what happened. It didn't have to happen this way. I am not the one who took IFI offline. They did. Call me all the name you want and through those insults. When it happens to you, you will understand. Don't think it won't.
It won't happen to me because I won't be so selfish as to demand that any forum pull all my posts. You did take IFI offline by suing. You chose to take it to that level. You did not have to. You can deflect all you want and say it was IFI's fault because they didn't do what you wanted. The simple fact remains. You chose to do it. You chose to call a lawyer. You did not have to. You could have let it go.
Your more worried about your intellectual property rights than the many many people on the site who had nothing to do with this.
4:05 pm
NWBA Member
January 15, 2013
Most Users Ever Online: 668
Currently Online:
16 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Larry L: 1566
Grant: 1420
Bruce Macmillan: 625
Lee Cordochorea: 595
Lynn Gledhill: 572
JNewman: 520
Gene C: 504
J Wilson: 426
Eric Sprado: 383
Tom Allyn: 340
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 22
Members: 8724
Moderators: 4
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 23
Forums: 97
Topics: 3538
Posts: 20289
Newest Members:
cameliacity, fred.f.chopin, RuoYi, rodeoneerer, NWBABjorn, mddangelo, Nevillberger, Crusty Veteran, redwoodforgeoakland, JimekalmiyaModerators: Steve McGrew: 77, N.W.B.A.: 72, webmaster: 0, bluehost: 0
Administrators: admin: 540