4:52 pm
March 22, 2010
I just visited Joe down in Bend and was impressed by his shop, each hammer had a real foundation.... I thought I had really done a skookum job of my 4B foundation.... its 6' deep and has 12 yards of concrete.... Well Joes is 10 feet deep and has 22 yards of mud... cripes! Anyway one of the things Joe said which I never really thought of but made a lot of sense was most people think the foundation as support mass for the anvil, but a much more critical asspect is to keep the hammer frame from lifting up off the anvil... the frame is unsupported by mass, (its out in the air, not planted in the ground right?) its energy is trying to lift the frame in air, so on a two peice hammer all that foundation mass and those big bolts help to keep from losing all that energy and the better its connected and the more mass under it the better job it does....
I know this is not earth shattering news... Just something that I didn't think about... Another reason why not to skimp on a foundation for a two peice hammer...
Whatever you are, be a good one.
Abraham Lincoln
8:00 pm
August 5, 2010
Kinda agree, Kinda dont....
think of it like a forging press, you have an elastic circuit in the frame which should be tight and rigid - the energy goes into the workpiece, not stretching the frame or tie rods un-necessarily.
So (to my mind, might be wrong of course!) at the moment of impact of the hammer ram there is a 'circuit' created (loop?) with the hot metal in the closing of the loop.
Within reason, so long as the anvil is supported under its base (ie cannot deflect downwards) , and the hammer is pinned down the elastic circuit is fine. The upwards motion of the hammer frame on striking a blow can be fairly easily calculated (air pressure x surface area of head of ram = upwards force on hammer frame) hammer hold down bolt diameter, quantity and length can be calculated withstand this loading.
If the hammer is set square the ram is effectively 'floating' so its only action on the hammer frame is minor friction and air pressure.
so, to cut a ramble short there is a law of diminishing returns on concrete (mass) under the anvil, but there is a point for mass under the hammer that the hammer frame can not lift, ie a definitive cut off point in usefull mass. Even if the hammer frame lifts the whole inertia block / anvil they remain in the same 'loop', very little loss of energy to the work piece...
am I way off the mark here? discuss 😀
8:45 pm
May 13, 2010
I find I get more "lift" on the hammer when the air gets choked at the TOP of the stroke. Trying to get a single hard blow and don't quite time it right and the head flies up a full stroke and "buffers" as the Massey manual calls it. Not hitting the top although I am sure that would be very bad but slowing very rapidly.
8:50 pm
August 5, 2010
9:41 pm
August 23, 2010
11:46 pm
March 18, 2010
Well, I ran my 200 pound Chambersburg 1-piece sitting on the floor on timbers. Might have been giving up a little.
Joe's hammer is a real 500 pound 4-B and has a 10,000 pound anvil! 22 yards might have been over-kill, but hey, mud's cheap.
“There are painters who transform the sun into a yellow spot,
but then there are others who, with the help of their art and their intelligence,
transform a yellow spot into the sun.” ~ Pablo Picasso ~
11:49 pm
March 18, 2010
JNewman;13362 wrote: I find I get more "lift" on the hammer when the air gets choked at the TOP of the stroke. Trying to get a single hard blow and don't quite time it right and the head flies up a full stroke and "buffers" as the Massey manual calls it. Not hitting the top although I am sure that would be very bad but slowing very rapidly.
Chambersburgs have a simple cushion that sometimes doesn't work all that well. Jump on the treadle to quick and you can smack the head! Need to get them cycling a little first. Saw one broken that way once.
“There are painters who transform the sun into a yellow spot,
but then there are others who, with the help of their art and their intelligence,
transform a yellow spot into the sun.” ~ Pablo Picasso ~
11:03 pm
May 18, 2010
The hammers that were at the old BHP steelworks here in Newcastle Oz were steam hammers that had been modified to run on air. Basically they had an air buffer fitted in place of the top cover and had the trigger removed. The guys that drove them would in order to get a bigger blow would drive the hammer up into the buffer as a starting point to get the rod moving quicker in preperation for their blow.
We have gone with the recomended foundation size in Massey literature, which has been adequate for our ground situation with our 5cwt. I think we used about 10 cubic metres of concrete under our 5cwt, not sure how that converts to cubic yards.
Phil
Most Users Ever Online: 668
Currently Online:
7 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Larry L: 1566
Grant: 1420
Bruce Macmillan: 625
Lee Cordochorea: 595
Lynn Gledhill: 572
JNewman: 520
Gene C: 504
J Wilson: 426
Eric Sprado: 383
Tom Allyn: 340
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 22
Members: 8721
Moderators: 4
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 23
Forums: 97
Topics: 3537
Posts: 20288
Newest Members:
rodeoneerer, NWBABjorn, mddangelo, Nevillberger, Crusty Veteran, redwoodforgeoakland, Jimekalmiya, George_Kelley, Roger Hayden, mill sparksModerators: Steve McGrew: 77, N.W.B.A.: 72, webmaster: 0, bluehost: 0
Administrators: admin: 540