Northwest Blacksmith Association

Hammer foundations.... | My Shop | Forum

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Hammer foundations....
November 14, 2011
4:52 pm
Avatar
Larry L
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 1566
Member Since:
March 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I just visited Joe down in Bend and was impressed by his shop, each hammer had a real foundation.... I thought I had really done a skookum job of my 4B foundation.... its 6' deep and has 12 yards of concrete.... Well Joes is 10 feet deep and has 22 yards of mud... cripes! Anyway one of the things Joe said which I never really thought of but made a lot of sense was most people think the foundation as support mass for the anvil, but a much more critical asspect is to keep the hammer frame from lifting up off the anvil... the frame is unsupported by mass, (its out in the air, not planted in the ground right?) its energy is trying to lift the frame in air, so on a two peice hammer all that foundation mass and those big bolts help to keep from losing all that energy and the better its connected and the more mass under it the better job it does....

I know this is not earth shattering news... Just something that I didn't think about... Another reason why not to skimp on a foundation for a two peice hammer...

Whatever you are, be a good one.
Abraham Lincoln

November 29, 2011
8:00 pm
Avatar
John N
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 62
Member Since:
August 5, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30018sp_Permalink sp_Print

Kinda agree, Kinda dont....

think of it like a forging press, you have an elastic circuit in the frame which should be tight and rigid - the energy goes into the workpiece, not stretching the frame or tie rods un-necessarily.

So (to my mind, might be wrong of course!) at the moment of impact of the hammer ram there is a 'circuit' created (loop?) with the hot metal in the closing of the loop.

Within reason, so long as the anvil is supported under its base (ie cannot deflect downwards) , and the hammer is pinned down the elastic circuit is fine. The upwards motion of the hammer frame on striking a blow can be fairly easily calculated (air pressure x surface area of head of ram = upwards force on hammer frame) hammer hold down bolt diameter, quantity and length can be calculated withstand this loading.

If the hammer is set square the ram is effectively 'floating' so its only action on the hammer frame is minor friction and air pressure.

so, to cut a ramble short there is a law of diminishing returns on concrete (mass) under the anvil, but there is a point for mass under the hammer that the hammer frame can not lift, ie a definitive cut off point in usefull mass. Even if the hammer frame lifts the whole inertia block / anvil they remain in the same 'loop', very little loss of energy to the work piece...

am I way off the mark here? discuss 😀

November 29, 2011
8:45 pm
Avatar
JNewman
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 520
Member Since:
May 13, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30019sp_Permalink sp_Print

I find I get more "lift" on the hammer when the air gets choked at the TOP of the stroke. Trying to get a single hard blow and don't quite time it right and the head flies up a full stroke and "buffers" as the Massey manual calls it. Not hitting the top although I am sure that would be very bad but slowing very rapidly.

November 29, 2011
8:50 pm
Avatar
John N
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 62
Member Since:
August 5, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30020sp_Permalink sp_Print

haddnt considered that John, Nothing to do with the forging efficency of the hammer, but all the energy of the ram flying upwards being stopped dead!

I wonder what the 'spike' in air pressure would be in that situation ?

November 29, 2011
9:41 pm
Avatar
Rob F
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 171
Member Since:
August 23, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30021sp_Permalink sp_Print

Larry, do you have Nazel foundation info? How does the foundation requirement change for say a Nazel 3b 1 piece compared to a 2 piece? I am curious to see if they are the same because wouldn't the one piece frame take all the force of the ram trying to lift the hammer?:confused:

November 29, 2011
11:46 pm
Avatar
Grant
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 1420
Member Since:
March 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30025sp_Permalink sp_Print

Well, I ran my 200 pound Chambersburg 1-piece sitting on the floor on timbers. Might have been giving up a little.

Joe's hammer is a real 500 pound 4-B and has a 10,000 pound anvil! 22 yards might have been over-kill, but hey, mud's cheap.

“There are painters who transform the sun into a yellow spot,
but then there are others who, with the help of their art and their intelligence,
transform a yellow spot into the sun.” ~ Pablo Picasso ~

November 29, 2011
11:49 pm
Avatar
Grant
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 1420
Member Since:
March 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30026sp_Permalink sp_Print

JNewman;13362 wrote: I find I get more "lift" on the hammer when the air gets choked at the TOP of the stroke. Trying to get a single hard blow and don't quite time it right and the head flies up a full stroke and "buffers" as the Massey manual calls it. Not hitting the top although I am sure that would be very bad but slowing very rapidly.

Chambersburgs have a simple cushion that sometimes doesn't work all that well. Jump on the treadle to quick and you can smack the head! Need to get them cycling a little first. Saw one broken that way once.

“There are painters who transform the sun into a yellow spot,
but then there are others who, with the help of their art and their intelligence,
transform a yellow spot into the sun.” ~ Pablo Picasso ~

January 4, 2012
11:03 pm
Avatar
Phil
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 67
Member Since:
May 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30549sp_Permalink sp_Print

The hammers that were at the old BHP steelworks here in Newcastle Oz were steam hammers that had been modified to run on air. Basically they had an air buffer fitted in place of the top cover and had the trigger removed. The guys that drove them would in order to get a bigger blow would drive the hammer up into the buffer as a starting point to get the rod moving quicker in preperation for their blow.
We have gone with the recomended foundation size in Massey literature, which has been adequate for our ground situation with our 5cwt. I think we used about 10 cubic metres of concrete under our 5cwt, not sure how that converts to cubic yards.

Phil

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 668

Currently Online:
7 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Larry L: 1566

Grant: 1420

Bruce Macmillan: 625

Lee Cordochorea: 595

Lynn Gledhill: 572

JNewman: 520

Gene C: 504

J Wilson: 426

Eric Sprado: 383

Tom Allyn: 340

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 22

Members: 8721

Moderators: 4

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 23

Forums: 97

Topics: 3537

Posts: 20288

Newest Members:

rodeoneerer, NWBABjorn, mddangelo, Nevillberger, Crusty Veteran, redwoodforgeoakland, Jimekalmiya, George_Kelley, Roger Hayden, mill sparks

Moderators: Steve McGrew: 77, N.W.B.A.: 72, webmaster: 0, bluehost: 0

Administrators: admin: 540