Northwest Blacksmith Association

Who Should Pay for the Conference Hands-on Classes? | Page 7 | For the Good of the Order | Forum

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Who Should Pay for the Conference Hands-on Classes?
November 1, 2010
4:13 am
Avatar
Ryan Wilson
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 204
Member Since:
April 12, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21313sp_Permalink sp_Print

So here's a good one.

anyone else think it was stupid to have a 2 sets of hands on demonstrators at the last conference and only one set got paid?

Pay them or don't pay them charge or don't. But its asinine to pay one person and not another for the same job.

jack
charging for the class isn't about making a profit. We started charging to make up for the rising cost of materials and the instructors. Its not healthy for the group to go bankrupt after every conference. The more money left over after a conference the more we have to better the group by offering scholarships and helping out those who cant afford it. or for buying tools, and upkeep on sound equipment and the hands on area. There is nothing wrong with savings.

yes it was free in the past, however it sure is alot cheaper than a full 3 day class.

well its off to bed, first day back to smithing since being laied off for 2 months tomorrow!
ryan

November 1, 2010
3:55 pm
Avatar
kenbo
Member
Registered User


NWBA Member
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
March 26, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21318sp_Permalink sp_Print

I can see paying instructors. But no way shoulds we charge for hands on. The NWBA is here to teach and get people into blacksmithing.

kent

November 1, 2010
3:59 pm
Avatar
rommel
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
June 17, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21319sp_Permalink sp_Print

Rich Waugh;3642 wrote: Here's my two cents' worth:

Yes the students should have to pay a nominal fee - say, $25. Since the participants are selected by a lottery, perhaps a couple of the selectees could "win" free admission. One out of ten, perhaps? That adds the possibility of a free ride, something that might increase participation and somewhat defuse the issue of charging. Kinda like a win at iron in the hat.

There ain't no such thing as a free lunch. Those who work the hands-on classes should get paid for it, otherwise you don't have any control over how good a job they do. Those who really teach well have a skill/gift they are sharing for which they deserve compensation. Teaching is actually much more difficult that demonstrating.

Rich

Put the charge for the hands on classes on the registration sheet, then there will not be any surprises.(conference registration) Twenty-twenty five bucks for a class is nothing if you want to learn something valuable.If you don't put forth the effort and/or some money then you aren't serious. Blacksmithing for a living is HARD, dealing with the people is the hardest! Kids need to know this, if they can't sacrifice something now they won't make it in blacksmithing. PS the demonstrators should be paid.

I said my piece. Thanks, Gary

November 1, 2010
4:03 pm
Avatar
Larry L
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 1566
Member Since:
March 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21320sp_Permalink sp_Print

Ryan Wilson;3791 wrote: So here's a good one.

anyone else think it was stupid to have a 2 sets of hands on demonstrators at the last conference and only one set got paid?

Pay them or don't pay them charge or don't. But its asinine to pay one person and not another for the same job.

jack
charging for the class isn't about making a profit. We started charging to make up for the rising cost of materials and the instructors. Its not healthy for the group to go bankrupt after every conference. The more money left over after a conference the more we have to better the group by offering scholarships and helping out those who cant afford it. or for buying tools, and upkeep on sound equipment and the hands on area. There is nothing wrong with savings.

yes it was free in the past, however it sure is alot cheaper than a full 3 day class.

well its off to bed, first day back to smithing since being laied off for 2 months tomorrow!
ryan

I agree Ryan... Thats pretty crappy and a good way to start hard feelings

Whatever you are, be a good one.
Abraham Lincoln

November 1, 2010
4:13 pm
Avatar
Mike Neely
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 32
Member Since:
April 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21321sp_Permalink sp_Print

All of the hands-on instructors listed in the Fall Conference schedule were offered full payment for their classes. I'm not sure if all of them chose to accept the payment, but I am sure they were offered. Where did anyone get the idea that only certain instructors were paid?

November 1, 2010
4:25 pm
Avatar
Ryan Wilson
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 204
Member Since:
April 12, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21322sp_Permalink sp_Print

mike then why was there only a fee for the normal hands on classes and the other station was free?
it was my understanding and several others i talked to, that those instructors didnt get payed.

November 1, 2010
4:26 pm
Avatar
Guest
Guests
21323sp_Permalink sp_Print

" Remember all this started because one member complained publicly during the general meeting."

No . It started when the changes were made. Don't blame the lady.

"The how seems to have broken down into almost a left/right debate. "

simple.
You made it so.
"There ain't no such thing as a free lunch."
" Firstly I believe in the 'user pays' principle"
" I think if you pay for something, you appreciate it more."
" and nothing in life is free."
"To expect a free ride is to not be very well in tune with traditional blacksmithing."(extra big lol at that)but not a classic as

"imbibes the culture of 'no free lunch' " That's a personal favourite

maybe if some of you were not so interested in teaching Adults your made up "values" and cynicism do you want me to start trying to teach my values. lol I think not..Leave "values" out of this discussion.

"but If you do'nt help an aspiring smith to understand the real world are you really helping them?"

That really was the funniest.

"I would imagine the board charged the fee to try and resolve an issue of the hands on costs getting out of hand and impacting the conference budget."

Now that is part of a real argument. good. I get it.
"It make for hard feelings sometimes when you're forced to subsidize someone else who makes ten times what you do."

Yea I really DO get that. have done so lets play devils advocate.

About them wives and kids discounts? No really. A twenties member, single without kids might resent this subsidising. After all teach them "nothing is for free"

Personally I can't see how we could charge for some kids who are not there for the smithing but because they are just there .

Charge whatever but get real with your arguments.

Whats in the way..... .Is the way

November 1, 2010
4:30 pm
Avatar
Guest
Guests
21324sp_Permalink sp_Print

"Blacksmithing for a living is HARD, dealing with the people is the hardest! Kids need to know this, if they can't sacrifice something now they won't make it in blacksmithing."

I like the arguments from Mike. he seems to leave that out.
so I will leave it to him and the others to decide. have at it. good luck.
.
Sorry to offend everyone.

November 1, 2010
4:40 pm
Avatar
Mike Neely
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 32
Member Since:
April 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21325sp_Permalink sp_Print

Ryan, I'm not really sure what you mean by "normal hands-on" but if you are talking about the open forge area or the black smoke alley (ab-normal hands-on?) then you are correct. Open forge is not a formal class, but a place where any smith can share his knowledge with other members. During the course of the event, quit a few smiths were demonstrating and assisting. A few guys approached it a little more formally than others, but they were all volunteers.
The folks in black smoke alley were also volunteers. We did supply the coal for the sessions.
If anybody had gripes about compensation, they didn't get to me.
Geez - Did anybody have a GOOD time at the conference?

November 1, 2010
4:59 pm
Avatar
craig
Member
Registered User


NWBA Member
Forum Posts: 61
Member Since:
October 29, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21326sp_Permalink sp_Print

Is there a attendance number that would pay for everything we want to be free at the conference, or included at the conference, because it would be cover by the conference fees? ( at the last event) How much were we short of the break even point with and with out the auction?

I don't know how many attended, but lets say 200 did and if 250 did, would that have covered all the costs of the event and is that the break even point?

I think all we are after is, the break even point and there are several ways to get there.
We tried the $20 dollar fee at the last event.

I guess the question is how do we do that in the future?

November 1, 2010
5:06 pm
Avatar
Lee Cordochorea
Member
Registered User


NWBA Member

Board Member
Forum Posts: 595
Member Since:
April 26, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21327sp_Permalink sp_Print

Mike Neely;3804 wrote:
Geez - Did anybody have a GOOD time at the conference?

Yes. I did.

No matter where you go... there you are.

November 1, 2010
5:11 pm
Avatar
J Wilson
Member
Registered User


NWBA Member
Forum Posts: 426
Member Since:
July 9, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21328sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yes. And we expect to have a great time every time!

Thanks for all the efffort everyone puts in to every event.

Jeff Wilson
Now back to the shop to prepare a project for a couple of teens coming by later.

My son is the Blacksmith

November 1, 2010
5:12 pm
Avatar
Paul Estes
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 280
Member Since:
April 21, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21329sp_Permalink sp_Print

Wow to be honest I am glad I didnt go, after already having butted heads with a couple folks on here then what I heard here, I would have washed my hands of the whole association. But there have been a few kind folks around and I guess that alone has made me rethink the having nothing to do with the NWBA. Now if I remember correctly even before the Conference someone in a thread asked what it would cost to come to the event, and once again if I remember correctly he was told its free just come on down. Now I can see where it would upset folks that may have seen that as well and showed up and be told well we gotta charge ya for specific classes or events. And while I can see charging for materials and gas or coal...yada yada, not having seen that specifically spelled out LONG before hand so people who are financially challenged like myself can try and put something away towards that end.
And yes people put in alot of time and work to get ready for these events and put out personal money to get there and whatnot, but something I think everyone is forgetting is what got us all involved on the Path, our love of making things and working with steel. We all learned something from someone for free most of the time and in repayment helped the teacher out with stuff or found some way to compensate the person for the knowledge. But what I am seeing is alot of the Pay me mentality instead of do what you can. I mean g-d forbid that someone came to me of all people and wanted to learn something or just to play a bit, but I would not charge someone for it, at most I would say bring a bottle of wine or something fun to drink and a chair cause I take lots of breaks.
But I know Ill get flamed for this viewpoint, it should have been more upfront long before people showed up at the gate. Charge for the materials for the hands on classes not for the sharing of knowledge and time. Are we not trying to share info or just show off?

P

November 1, 2010
6:56 pm
Avatar
Grant
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 1420
Member Since:
March 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21330sp_Permalink sp_Print

The conferences have never been free. Don't know where you could have gotten that idea. They cost the association around $15,000.00 to put on. Dues only cover the cost of the newsletter, insurance and administrative costs for the association and often falls short of that.

Once you are at the conference, there are plenty of things to do with lots of opportunities to learn and hammer iron without spending more.

We charge for the conference because there are costs associated with it. We charge for dinner because there are costs associated with it. And we charge for the hands-on classes because there are costs associated with it. It can't be lumped in with the conference because only a small number of the conference-goers are chosen.

As long as there are costs, the money has to come from somewhere. That was the only question posed in this thread: who should pay?

“There are painters who transform the sun into a yellow spot,
but then there are others who, with the help of their art and their intelligence,
transform a yellow spot into the sun.” ~ Pablo Picasso ~

November 1, 2010
7:33 pm
Avatar
Lee Cordochorea
Member
Registered User


NWBA Member

Board Member
Forum Posts: 595
Member Since:
April 26, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21331sp_Permalink sp_Print

Grant;3809 wrote: The conferences have never been free. Don't know where you could have gotten that idea.

He probably is thinking of the first conference being free to new members...
http://blacksmith.org/forums/c.....rence-2010

No matter where you go... there you are.

November 1, 2010
7:36 pm
Avatar
Donk
Member
Registered User


NWBA Member
Forum Posts: 29
Member Since:
July 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21333sp_Permalink sp_Print

I think we need to cover reasonable materials and maybe a SMALL set fee OR Conf Reg free for Hands On Demonstrators. For years while helping other smiths setup for demonstrations, I have seen tons of materials and time donated to NWBA for classes etc. Most persons involved Did not "Make Money" on a class. It was noted that this was to show "something cool" and Teach someone along the way (sometimes in spite of themselves).

That was and is in line with what NWBA is supposed to stand for. An that is, I Believe, how we should handle the demonstrators end of this equation.

Hands on Winners (if you stand around the drawing it is the second most crowded time in the administration/Gallery area.) EVERY CONFERENCE! people want in and they are interested. I am as poor (or moreso) than anyone here, but I think the $20.00 for winners is fine.
Maybe something could be added to this. *) one postion is set aside to JUST BE FOR NEW SMITHS. The person who is (seperate Drawing?) a "learner" position and that person is covered for a short article like the GRANTS we have. For smiths who are serious to learn the $20.00 is OK. If a demonstrator or someone else wants to pay the fees then we could have a sponsored hands on. But really we just need to keep teaching so whatever way we do to accomplish this, free or not is ok.

Lastly, The tomahawk class was a lot, a lot of material and a lot of smithing hands on. That is great, but is at the limit of both cost and structure. I am not sure we can afford to do many of those. Thanks to all who helped and demo'ed on that one.

PSS. MIKEY , you done good. Conf Good, rain bad!

Dave Lisch, please update on Tamahagane outcome from the cool "sand into steel" demo.

-DONK

November 1, 2010
7:51 pm
Avatar
Grant
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 1420
Member Since:
March 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21334sp_Permalink sp_Print

Lee Cordochorea;3810 wrote: He probably is thinking of the first conference being free to new members...
http://blacksmith.org/forums/c.....rence-2010

Thanks Lee. That's probably what he's talking about. It wasn't exactly "free" you still had to pay $45.00 for membership at registration. This Fall conference brought in 34 new members! They got the whole conference for free and also had the opportunity to put their names in the hat for classes.

Would it help if we called the free open forges "hands-on" and the paid classes "special project class offerings"?

“There are painters who transform the sun into a yellow spot,
but then there are others who, with the help of their art and their intelligence,
transform a yellow spot into the sun.” ~ Pablo Picasso ~

November 1, 2010
8:04 pm
Avatar
Paul Estes
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 280
Member Since:
April 21, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21337sp_Permalink sp_Print

That might actually help differentiate between pay and no pay so there is no confusion caused, and yes that was the posting that confused me. Maybe even putting the pay no pay events in BOLD and different colors so they are easily Identified, free GREEN, and pay RED....heheheheheh

November 1, 2010
8:37 pm
Avatar
Grant
Member
Registered User
Forum Posts: 1420
Member Since:
March 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21338sp_Permalink sp_Print

Something I was stumping for for long time was only giving the instructors a full comp for the conference in lieu of any payment. One reason we haven't gone this route is that it is currently prohibited by our bylaws. We are in the middle of re-writing our bylaws for our transition to 501(c)3 status and we may be able to amend that wording.

“There are painters who transform the sun into a yellow spot,
but then there are others who, with the help of their art and their intelligence,
transform a yellow spot into the sun.” ~ Pablo Picasso ~

November 1, 2010
8:42 pm
Avatar
Tom Ferry
Member
Registered User


NWBA Member
Forum Posts: 76
Member Since:
March 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21339sp_Permalink sp_Print

Donk,
I am pretty sure Larry donated all his time to the Tomahawk class, so I don't think we need to get into breaking the problem down to each individual class costs. If we were to eliminate classes based on materials and work involved we would all be making leaves at every event, sounds kinda boring to me.

Mike Neely,
I had a great time at the conference, did not see much but everyone I talked with seemed to be enjoying themselves except for the rain.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 668

Currently Online:
41 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Larry L: 1566

Grant: 1420

Bruce Macmillan: 625

Lee Cordochorea: 595

Lynn Gledhill: 572

JNewman: 520

Gene C: 504

J Wilson: 426

Eric Sprado: 383

Tom Allyn: 340

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 22

Members: 8725

Moderators: 4

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 23

Forums: 97

Topics: 3538

Posts: 20289

Newest Members:

churndashmaven, cameliacity, fred.f.chopin, RuoYi, rodeoneerer, NWBABjorn, mddangelo, Nevillberger, Crusty Veteran, redwoodforgeoakland

Moderators: Steve McGrew: 77, N.W.B.A.: 72, webmaster: 0, bluehost: 0

Administrators: admin: 540